Statistics

Job Placement Statistics in 2026: Apprenticeships, Veterans, and Job Corps

A data-driven look at placement rates, completions, wages, and program scale.

Job placement statistics at a glance

Job placement statistics are most useful when you look at them as a set: participation, completions, employment outcomes, and where placements actually happen. The dataset here spans apprenticeship, veteran-support, and Job Corps reporting, so the clearest story is how different workforce pipelines convert participants into workers, completers, and employed exiters.

Fast facts

  • FY21 Registered Apprenticeship had 547,922 active apprentices and added 229,961 new apprentices (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics).
  • 96,070 apprentices completed programs in FY21 (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics).
  • Job Corps serves more than 60,000 new students each year and operates 119 centers nationwide (U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports).
  • In PY24, 64 percent of HVRP exiters were placed into employment and their average hourly wage was $19.49 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • Job Corps graduate full-time job placement rate ranged from 72 percent to 74 percent in the process study center tables (Job Corps Process Study Final Report).

Table of contents

  1. What job placement statistics measure
  2. Registered apprenticeship placement and completion data
  3. Demographic patterns in apprenticeship participation
  4. Occupation and industry concentrations
  5. Veteran employment placement statistics
  6. Job Corps placement statistics
  7. How to read the numbers together

What job placement statistics measure

Job placement statistics are not one single metric. In this dataset, they describe several stages of the workforce pipeline:

  • active apprenticeship participation
  • new apprenticeship entry
  • apprenticeship completion
  • veteran employment placement through HVRP
  • Job Corps graduate placement outcomes

That matters because two programs can both claim strong “placement” performance while measuring different points in the process. One program may be tracking exits into jobs, while another is tracking center-level graduate placement or overall participation volume. The source labels in the CSV make those distinctions explicit, and that separation is the safest way to read the numbers.

Key takeaway

The highest-volume system in the dataset is Registered Apprenticeship, while the most direct employment-placement metric appears in HVRP, where 64 percent of exiters were placed into employment in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance). Job Corps sits between those two: it is a training pipeline with placement outcomes that vary by study table and time horizon (Job Corps Process Study Final Report).

Registered apprenticeship placement and completion data

Registered Apprenticeship provides the biggest block of job placement-related statistics in the dataset. The numbers show a system that is large, broad, and deeply tied to occupations with direct labor-market demand.

At a glance

MeasureFigureSource
Active apprentices in FY21547,922U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
New apprentices in FY21229,961U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Completers in FY2196,070U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Employer-only apprenticeship programs291,225 active apprenticesU.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Joint labor-management apprenticeship programs256,698 active apprenticesU.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

The headline is simple: 547,922 active apprentices is a very large placement pipeline by any standard (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). That total is not just a raw participation figure; it signals a structured pathway that brings new people into paid training and moves some of them toward completion.

The program also added 229,961 new apprentices in FY21, which means the inflow was substantial relative to the active base (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). Meanwhile, 96,070 completers shows that completion is meaningful but naturally smaller than the total active population.

A useful way to read the three numbers together is as a funnel:

  • active apprentices show the current pipeline size
  • new apprentices show recent intake
  • completers show completed labor-market preparation

That funnel shape is why apprenticeship appears so often in discussions about job placement statistics. It is not merely a classroom model; it links direct work experience, occupation-specific training, and eventual progression toward completion.

Why it matters

The size of the apprenticeship pipeline suggests that job placement outcomes are not limited to one narrow program. The data point to a multi-occupation system with enough scale to matter across sectors, especially where employers need a steady flow of trained workers.

Demographic patterns in apprenticeship participation

The demographic data in the CSV are especially useful because they show who is moving through the apprenticeship pipeline, not just how many people are present overall.

Gender split

GroupActive apprenticesNew apprenticesCompletersSource
Female73,67740,49115,606U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Male472,052187,69880,366U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

The gender split is sharply uneven. Male apprentices accounted for 472,052 active apprentices, compared with 73,677 female apprentices (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). The same pattern appears in new apprentices and completers.

That does not tell you anything by itself about quality or success. It does tell you where participation is concentrated, which is useful for employers, training sponsors, and workforce planners looking for opportunity gaps.

Race and ethnicity patterns

GroupActive apprenticesNew apprenticesCompletersSource
American Indian or Alaska Native6,5232,1651,006U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Asian8,2683,0231,430U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Black or African American41,78818,5465,737U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Multiple race129,72968,04822,822U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander5,6771,651655U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
White251,29990,31839,583U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Participants who did not self-identify race104,63846,21024,837U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

The largest category in this set is White apprentices, with 251,299 active apprentices and 39,583 completers (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). Another large category is Multiple race, with 129,729 active apprentices and 68,048 new apprentices.

Two things stand out:

  • race and ethnicity categories are not evenly distributed across apprenticeship participation
  • the “did not self-identify race” category is large enough to matter in any interpretation of the data

The dataset also separates Hispanic and non-Hispanic participation:

  • Hispanic apprentices included 117,651 active apprentices, 50,187 new apprentices, and 17,357 completers (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics).
  • Non-Hispanic apprentices included 321,720 active apprentices, 129,573 new apprentices, and 51,184 completers (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics).

Age and veteran status

GroupActive apprenticesNew apprenticesCompletersSource
Age 24 and under207,01285,89031,095U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Age 25-34217,52690,60641,903U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Age 35+111,89350,73722,971U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Non-veteran363,477135,37755,723U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Veteran32,54713,28515,155U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

The age distribution is balanced between the two younger groups: 207,012 apprentices age 24 and under and 217,526 apprentices age 25-34 (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). The 35+ group remains substantial at 111,893 active apprentices, which shows the pipeline is not limited to early-career entrants.

The veteran figures are notable because the number of completers, 15,155, is relatively high compared with 13,285 new apprentices in that category (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). That suggests the veteran segment has a meaningful completion presence in the dataset.

Occupation and industry concentrations

The apprenticeship statistics become more actionable when you look at where people are concentrated by occupation and industry.

Occupations with the largest active apprentice counts

OccupationActive apprenticesSource
Electrician71,812U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Carpenter29,800U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Plumber21,971U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Sprinkler fitter17,595U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Construction craft laborer15,009U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

Electrician is the largest occupation in this list by a wide margin, with 71,812 active apprentices (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). The rest of the top group is still heavily construction-linked, which reinforces how closely apprenticeship tracks with hands-on, employer-facing labor demand.

Industries with the largest active apprentice counts

IndustryActive apprenticesSource
Construction197,421U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Public administration135,269U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Educational services67,202U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics
Manufacturing23,720U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics

The largest industry is Construction, with 197,421 active apprentices (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics). That is followed by Public administration at 135,269. Those two categories alone represent a major share of the apprenticeship universe in this dataset.

What the concentration suggests

A few structural points follow from these numbers:

  • apprenticeship is heavily concentrated in work with visible skill ladders
  • occupation-specific placements dominate the headline counts
  • industrial demand is not spread evenly across sectors

This is where job placement statistics become especially practical. The data show where training pipelines already exist at scale, which in turn helps explain where employers are likely to find prepared candidates.

Veteran employment placement statistics

The HVRP figures are the most direct employment-placement measures in the dataset because they focus on actual exits into work and the wages associated with those exits.

HVRP performance at a glance

  • VETS awarded over $57 million to 32 new and 123 continuation HVRP grants in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • HVRP served 15,888 participants during PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • 64 percent of HVRP exiters were placed into employment in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • HVRP exiters had an average hourly wage of $19.49 in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • HVRP employment rate in the second quarter after exit was 43 percent (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • HVRP median earnings in the second quarter after exit were $8,710 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  • 12,116 participants were co-enrolled in AJCs, representing 76 percent of PY24 participants (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).

The strongest single placement number here is the 64 percent employment placement rate for exiters in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance). That is immediately understandable as a job outcome metric, and it is paired with wage data that gives the number more texture.

The $19.49 average hourly wage is important because placement quality is not just about getting a job, but about the wage attached to that job (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance). The 43 percent second-quarter-after-exit employment rate and $8,710 median earnings add a follow-up perspective rather than a point-in-time snapshot.

The co-enrollment figure is also meaningful. If 12,116 participants were co-enrolled in AJCs, that suggests HVRP is not operating in isolation; it is connecting with broader workforce infrastructure (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).

Job Corps placement statistics

Job Corps gives the dataset another placement lens: a national training system with large enrollment scale and study-based placement outcomes.

Core Job Corps figures

  • Job Corps serves more than 60,000 new students each year (U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports).
  • Job Corps operates 119 centers nationwide (U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports).
  • Job Corps annual federal cost is more than $1 billion (U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports).

Those three figures show scale, footprint, and investment. The placement outcomes in the process study give a more detailed view of how graduates performed in different center groupings.

Process study placement comparison

MetricTop-20 centersBottom-20 centersSource
Graduate full-time job placement rate74%72%Job Corps Process Study Final Report
Graduate 12-month placement rate84%78%Job Corps Process Study Final Report
Graduate 6-month placement rate89%89%Job Corps Process Study Final Report

The comparison is narrow but revealing. The top-20 centers and bottom-20 centers are close on full-time job placement, at 74 percent and 72 percent respectively (Job Corps Process Study Final Report). The gap widens a bit on the 12-month placement rate, where the top-20 centers reach 84 percent and the bottom-20 centers reach 78 percent.

The most interesting number is the 89 percent 6-month placement rate in both the top-20 and bottom-20 center tables (Job Corps Process Study Final Report). That suggests the short-term placement measure was strong across both groups in the study table, even if the longer-term picture was less uniform.

What to read into the Job Corps numbers

These figures do not tell you everything about program quality, but they do suggest:

  • Job Corps operates at national scale
  • placement outcomes vary by time horizon
  • performance differences may be more visible in longer follow-up windows than in the 6-month measure

How to read the numbers together

The dataset is strongest when you compare the programs rather than treating each statistic in isolation.

Three distinct placement models

  1. Registered Apprenticeship is the largest pipeline in the dataset, with 547,922 active apprentices and 96,070 completers (U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics).
  2. HVRP focuses directly on post-service employment placement, showing 64 percent placed into employment and $19.49 average hourly wages for exiters in PY24 (U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance).
  3. Job Corps sits between training and labor-market entry, with more than 60,000 new students each year and placement rates in the 72 percent to 89 percent range depending on the measure and table (U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports; Job Corps Process Study Final Report).

The simplest read

If you want the broadest single takeaway from these job placement statistics, it is this: the strongest placement systems in the dataset are not measured by one number alone. They are measured by combinations of scale, completion, employment rate, and wage quality.

That is why the source labels matter. The apprenticeship numbers come from U.S. Department of Labor FY 2021 Data and Statistics, the veteran placement outcomes come from U.S. Department of Labor HVRP Performance, and the Job Corps figures come from U.S. Department of Labor National Job Corps Reports and Job Corps Process Study Final Report. Those labels keep the claims grounded and make it easier to compare systems without flattening their differences.

Quick readout

  • Apprenticeship is the largest volume pipeline in the dataset.
  • HVRP provides the clearest direct placement rate.
  • Job Corps shows strong placement performance but with variation by center group and follow-up period.
  • Occupation and industry concentration are highest in construction-linked roles.
  • Demographic splits show the pipeline is broad, but participation is uneven across groups.

Written by

cornucopia-inc.org Editorial Team

Editorial team

Independent editorial coverage of inclusive everyday living.